Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Welcome to kisikawpimootewin and group(s) website!

Home
Open letter By Kevin Annett to P.M. Paul Martin, 50,000 missing residential school children.
4. Petition Of Right, NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW INCLUDING MONARCHS, 1627
4a. Petition Of Right, NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW INCLUDING MONARCHS ,1860
5. Letter And Petition To Queen's Privy Council For Canada May 13, 2004
5a. Take Notice to the Queen's Privy Council For Canada/ their REFUSAL TO UPHOLD HER MAJESTY'S LAW
5b. Letter to Governor General /Refusal/Queen's Privy Council for Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law
6. Letter/Gov.Dept./OF CANADA/PRIVY OFFICE, Indians remain bound under enfranchisement scheme
7. Petition Of Right - Federal Court June 9, 2004
7a. Response/Refusal June 11, 2004 ADMIRALTY COURT OF CANADA/Her Majesty's Law Abolished
7b. Federal Court Act 1970/Admiralty Court/enforcement of current regulations only
8. Letter/Her Majesty/Refusal/by Her Officers/Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law/Treason/June16,2004
9. Statement Of Claim
9a. Strategies For Statement Of Claim
9b. Correspondence of kisikawpimootewin and Attorney General re: Statement of Claim
10. Take Notice To All Peoples on miskanahkministik
11. Petition to United Nations Human Rights Commitee, Special Rapporteur
11a. Petition to United Nations Human Rights Committee, Petition Team
11b. Petition sent to the Countries of the World
11c. Take Notice to the People(s) for the World
12. Notice Of Constitutional Questions, October 15, 2004
12a. Notice Of Constitutional Questions, October 15, 2004
The Great Law
The Great Law (compilation of six translations), pgs. 1-5 of 27 pgs.
Great Law pgs. 6 - 11
Great Law pgs. 12 - 17
Great Law pgs. 18 - 22
Great Law pgs. 23 - 27
Links

Under Construction!

Welcome to our open forum website!

All peoples are invited to participate and share their information and knowledge regarding the routing that has enslaved the Peoples of the world, enabling the corporations to destroy our food, water and air, upon pretence of greed for the natural resources and if left unchecked, will lead to the total extinction of all life on the planet.

Routing Used To Enslave The Sovereign Indigenous Peoples

Proposed Routing To Free The Sovereign Indigenous Peoples

Questions, Comments, Suggestions, Post Yours Here In Our Open Forum

Routing Used To Enslave The Non-Indigenous Peoples

 

New Updates

This website is a work in progress, as such we will be adding additional documents on an on going basis. When we make an update, we will list it here.

 

New Update November 3, 2005:

 

re: "Self determination" (drafted and ratified constitution) for the Indigenous Peoples on turtle island

Refer to Proposed Routing To Free The Sovereign Indigenous Peoples

 

   Thank you for your patience and for visiting our site. 

Please note the scheme of enfranchisement and its provisions

of enslaving the Sovereign Indigenous Peoples under the subject matter jurisdiction titled CANADA. The scheme of the War Measures

Act and its Provisions upon the pretence of order and good government continues to hold Her Majesty's Subjects and the enfranchised Sovereign Indigeous Peoples, in a time of peace, hold in a lawless state of color and force of Martial Law, by ever changing regulations of the titled Canada. If you have any suggestions, or inquiries, please contact us. Contact

Information at the bottom of the page, or join us in our open forum.

We are an open forum research and study group who collectively have journeyed on a path for a number of years accumulating document(s) of the scheme(s) and routing used by the titled CANADA to enslave and by fraud remove the Lawful standing, recognition and right of claim(s) of the referred to and titled separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik (turtle island). We invite any and all to contribute and or assist us in our journey.

 By right of Heritage, Custom, Usage and chosen mode(s) of life, I am kisikawpimootewin, bear clan, sentient Human being, Heir and Successor, of a Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, referred to as NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S) on miskanahkministik. I kisikawpimootewin am a Signatory and Beneficiary by adhesion, of accepted offer(s) of the Royal Proclamation, The Will and Pleasure of Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) as Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) (hereinafter Her Majesty) for promise(s), benefit(s) and entitlement(s), under sealed Trust agreement(s) of the oral and written talks and negotiations made Sovereign to Sovereign, for the titled:

  

1.  Friendship Treaties (for the mutual benefits for trade and commerce)

 

2.   Peace Treaties (to keep secure the trade and commerce)

3.   Numbered Treaties (entrusting the Sovereign Territories to Her Majesty)

   Made with Queen Victoria, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) as Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s), Successor(s) and Predecessor(s) that apply equally to all or any of the referred to as Tribe(s) or Nation(s) of NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S) on the Trust Territories titled Canada. And further are free to enter into Treaties with Her Majesty, at any time or not, regardless of their choice, are always to remain unmolested and free in their Heritage, customs, usage and chosen mode(s) of life on miskanahkministik, for as long as the Sun Shines and the River(s) flow, on the land titled NORTH AMERICA. (Hereinafter Treaties)  

-made with- 

 

  The sentient Human beings, of separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples, Their Heir(s) and Successor(s) on miskanahkministik, referred to as Tribe(s) or Nation(s) of NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S), on the Trust Territories titled Canada (Hereinafter separate and distinct Peoples).

We respectfully submit, for your review, consideration and comments the following information that our group believes is the routing and scheme(s) used by the titled CANADA, to enslave by fraud, to remove the Lawful standing and Right(s) Of Claim, of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik (turtle island).

  The following are Her Majesty's Law (Royal Certified Acts of the Parliament of Great Britain) in compliance to His Majesty King George III, Proclaimed Royal Will and Pleasure of the titled Royal Proclamation, October 7, 1763. That upon pain of displeasure, (meaning at that time, for refusing to obey, committing treason, was death) Her Majesty's loyal subjects are to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law, and Her Majesty's loyal sworn Officer(s) are to obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty's Law regarding the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, Their Heir(s) and Successor(s) on miskanahkministik of the titled Canada.

 Take note: Her Majesty's law stands forever as written and can never be changed or abolished.

  

  His Majesty King George III (Royal Proclamation 1763) and Her Majesty Queen Victoria acknowledged the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples as Sovereign(s), and their Right Of Claim(s) to their Sovereign Territories on miskanahkministik (turtle island).

Her Majesty Queen Victoria in oral and written negotiations with the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples entered into formal agreements, Sovereign to Sovereign, binding their Heir(s) and Successor(s) for as long as the Sun Shines and the River(s) flow for the titled Friendship Treaties (for the mutual benefits for trade and commerce) on miskanahkministik, and further entered into oral and written negotiations and agreements to keep secure the titled Friendship Treaties, agreeing that neither side would molest nor harm one another, nor interfere with the Heritage, Customs, Usage, mode(s) of life and Law, of the other, titled Peace Treaties on miskanahkministik. Her Majesty Queen Victoria also made offers to assume as Fiduciary/Trustee the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples Sovereign Territories, that the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, by their choice, could accept, whenever, if ever, the titled Numbered Treaties.(entrusting the Sovereign Territories to Her Majesty)

 

Enfranchisement is the freedom of choice of one of the Sovereign Peoples of a Sovereign country to request/apply to become one of the Sovereign Peoples of another Sovereign country.

 

   If accepted, they must bind themselves, under subject matter jurisdiction, by sworn oath of allegiance, to only obey and uphold the Law (different from Sovereign country to Sovereign country but at all times, stands as written and ageless, and can never be changed or abolished) for that Sovereign country. Once sworn in, have lawful standing, right of claims, under subject matter jurisdiction, to be secure and protected under law, as one of the Sovereign Peoples of that Sovereign country.

 

No Sovereign country upon pretence of discretion or by any other means can usurp subject matter jurisdiction and enfranchise Sovereign Peoples of other Sovereign countries.

 

Even by United Nations conventions of war and conquest, the conquered Sovereign Peoples, must freely swear, an oath of allegiance, to be lawfully bound, under the subject matter jurisdiction and law, of the conquering Sovereign country.

 

The Lawful standing of the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, Their Heirs and Successor(s), Right(s) Of Claim(s), to the binding agreements, and to their Sovereign Territories on miskanahkministik, was removed, in treason, with no authority of Her Majesty’s Law, by fraud, by the titled Enfranchisement of the Sovereign and distinct group(s), their Heir(s) and Successor(s) and its provision(s) of the titled CANADA, that usurped subject matter jurisdiction of the distinct group(s) under the titled Governor of Canada and further by order of the Governor were enslaved under, with forced compliance of current regulation(s) by order(s) of the titled MINISTER and DEPARTMENTS OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS OF CANADA and  INDIAN ACT OF CANADA.

   Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) for the Commonwealth Countries swear an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors and bind themselves to only obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty’s Law. For refusal are in breach and in dereliction of the performance of there sworn duty to Her Majesty, committing act(s) of treason against Her Majesty.

 

Her Majesty's Officers for the titled Canada are bound by their sworn oaths of allegiance, to Her Majesty, to only obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty’s Law, and refuse in dereliction of their performance of their sworn duties to obey, uphold, and enforce the Proclaimed Royal Will and Pleasure of Her Majesty’s Law for the repeal of the enfranchisement of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples of Canada, and removal of all of its provision(s) and are committing with intent, knowledge and forethought by conspired action(s) and act(s) of treason against the Proclaimed will of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and Her Predecessor(s). And further, have refused in contempt to comply with International Law for the United Nations Conventions of Human Rights.

 

ie : decisions of July 30, 1981- Lovelace V. Canada (1981) 2H. R. L. J. 158 (UN H. R. C.).

 

And in contempt, continue to keep the sentient Human beings of Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, enslaved to a dictator, of the purported title, MINISTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS OF CANADA.

And forced compliance to its regulation(s) of the purported title, INDIAN ACT OF CANADA by pretence of provision(s) of the scheme of enfranchisement, of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples by Order(s) of the purported title as, GOVERNOR OF CANADA.

 1b. (found in Routing Used To Enslave The Non-Indigenous Peoples) DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS (highlighted in yellow page 3444) "No matter how parliament might protest under its own laws. They may wish a Mussolini in Italy, a Stalin in Russia or a Hitler in Germany, but we do not need a dictator in Canada; we do not need anyone exercising that sort of arbitrary autocratic authority in this country, the pride and security of British Peoples with respect to all such matters lie in their parliamentary institutions, and this parliament is the body to which the people of Canada must and have a right to look to have taxation controlled, and for peace, order and good government in the true sense of the words."
 
Take note, the previous Act(s) of MARTIAL LAW were made by the titled CANADA in treason,

 

The titled CANADA has no authority to make LAW.  

 

 Please refer to the index that lists the following correspondence  hightlighted  in yellow.  Petitions and refusals of Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) for the Trust Territories titled Canada:

 

4.   Petition Of Right 1627 

 

   Please carefully review, you will note, that at that time, the peoples of 1627, were held in a time of peace, in a lawless state, of colour and force of MARTIAL LAW, with no provisions, and in contravention of Her Majesty’s Law, in exactly the same manner, that the Peoples on the Trust Territories titled Canada, are being held under today.

 

4a. Petition Of Right 1860

    

Her Majesty's Law, by petition of Right, is the only means in which Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) can be held accountable for their refusal, in breach and treason of, their sworn oath(s), of their duty to Her Majesty. 

As well as dereliction of their duty, for refusing to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law.

 

5.  Letter And Petition To Queen's Privy Council For Canada May 13, 20045a. Take Notice, Failure To Respond To Petition By Queens Privy Council For Canada May 25, 2004.

 

5a. Take Notice, Failure To Respond To Petition By Queens Privy Council For Canada May 25, 2004.

 

5b.  Letter to Governor General /Refusal/Queen's Privy Council for Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law.

 

 6. Letter/Gov.Dept./OF CANADA/PRIVY OFFICE, Indians remain bound under enfranchisement scheme.

 

7. Petition Of Right - Federal Court June 9, 2004.

 

7a. Response/Refusal June 11, 2004 ADMIRALTY COURT OF CANADA/Her Majesty's Law Abolished.

 

   I bring to your attention (attached herein) to the letter sent to Her Majesty and the Petition of Right, for a claim of Right, brought before Her Majesty's Federal Court For Canada by kisikawpimootewin.

 

 And the response from the purported title; ADMIRALTY COURT OF CANADA, of the alleged "abolishment" of Her Majesty's Law by a department of the purported title;" FEDERAL PARLIAMENT OF CANADA".

  

 As such: Her Majesty's Law has no standing in "CANADA".

 

    Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) Successor(s) and Predecessor(s) Royal Proclaimed Will and Pleasure is enacted as standing Law by Royal Certified Act (s) of the Parliament of Great Britain. Her Majesty's Law's cannot be abolished. They remain forever as written to be obeyed and upheld at all times.

  

 7b. Federal Court Act 1970/Admiralty Court/enforcement of current regulations only.

 

8. Letter/Her Majesty/Refusal/by Her Officers/Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law/Treason/June16,2004.

  We have addressed the aforementioned situation, by Petition and a formal written request to Her Majesty and await Her written response and/or action.

   It is our intention, by Petition, to address the aforementioned, before Her Majesty’s Court for Law, of the titled Great Britain. Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) are bound by their oaths of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) to only obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty’s Law for the security and protection of the peoples of Her Majesty’s Commonwealth Countries.

  If Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) for the titled Great Britain fail/refuse to restore Her Majesty’s Law to secure and protect the peoples on the Trust Territories titled Canada and fail/refuse to free and restore the Heritage, Customs and Usage to the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples, on miskanahkministik and/or fulfill Her Majesty’s agreement(s) made with the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. Upon failure/refusal, Her Majesty forfeit(s), any and all Lawful claims and/or interests to the Trust Territories titled Canada, on miskanahkministik. The separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik, then have lawful standing and Right of Claim(s) to petition the United Nation(s) Security Council to send UN troops to secure and protect the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples, and other peoples on miskanahkministik under International Law, until such time as the Trust Territories titled Canada are returned and under the Heritage, Customs, and Usage of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. 

 Her Majesty's Parliament(s), For Her Dominion(s), have no power or authority to make it's own Law(s). Enacted as Royal Certified Act(s) of the Parliament(s) of Her Dominion(s), are only empowered to make enactment(s) for law. Statutes for enforcement for law as Royal Certified Act(s), of the Parliament of Great Britain. That when published in the Gazette, is law that Her Majesty's Loving Loyal subject(s) and Loyal sworn Officer(s) must obey and uphold. That said, all sentient Human Beings in good conscience should be seeking answers to the following questions:

1. What Legal instrument (Royal Certified Act of the Parliament of Great Britain) empowered and authorized the War Measures Act of 1914. And its provision(s) to dissolve Her Majesty's Dominion of Canada and power and authority of Her Majesty's Law and Parliament For the Dominion of Canada. Usurping subject mater jurisdiction of Her Majesty's Loyal Subject(s) and separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples under colour and force of Marshall Law?

 

2. Why are Her Majesty's Loyal Subject(s) and separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik, upon pretense of provision(s) of the enfranchisement scheme and upon pretense of provision(s) of order, security and good government of the War Measures Act 1914, held in a lawless state, of colour and force of Marshall Law, as regulations, by order(s) of a self-declared defacto GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL of the purported title CANADA?

 

3. Why hasn't Her Majesty ordered, or by force, reinstated Her Dominion of Canada, and the power and authority of Her Law to the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada? For the security and protection of Her Majesty's Loyal subjects on miskanahkministik.

 

4.  As justification upon pretense of provision(s) of the enfranchisement scheme and the War Measures Act. Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) appointed as commissioner(s) acting for the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL of the purported title CANADA in dereliction of duty are in treason of their sworn oath to Her Majesty. They refuse to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law, treaties, agreements and obligation(s) therein made with the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. 

 

5. Why hasn't Her Majesty ordered or addressed:

 The dereliction of duty in treason of sworn oaths for Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s)?


 The refusal to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law as Royal Proclamation and peace, Friendship (Trade and Commerce) and Numbered Treaties and law relating thereto made with the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik Sovereign to Sovereign?

6.   Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) have no power or authority, to refuse, amend or abolish Her Majesty's Treaties, agreement(s) and Law relating to the Peace and Friendship (trade and commerce) Treaties and Numbered Treaties made with the Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. 

   Nor to negotiate and make additional agreement(s) and purported Land claim Treaties with the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. By what power or authority does the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR of the purported title of CANADA, have legal standing, to bind the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik? Upon pretense of purported Land claims referred to as Treaties, negotiated with it's appointed employed representatives of its Departments of the titled FEDERAL and PROVINCIAL GOVERNING STRUCTURES and the titled INDIAN BAND(S)?

 

7.  By Her Majesty's action or lack thereof to secure and protect Her Majesty's Loving Loyal Subject(s) on miskanahkministik. Or to uphold and enforce the aforementioned Treaties, made with the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. Has Her Majesty forfeited any and all claim or rights on miskanahkministik?

 

8. Should not the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik and other Peoples on miskanahkministik, petition the United Nations Human Rights Committee, to be freed from a lawless state, of the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR of the purported title CANADA? To be secure and protected under International Law? Until such time as the Trust Territories are returned, and under control, by Heritage, Custom(s) and Law(s) of the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik?

 

9.  Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) appointed as Commissioner(s) or Minister(s) acting for the self- declared defacto GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL of the purported CANADA ADMIRALTY COURT declare and note the existence of Her Majesty's Law, but has no standing, force or effect. They only uphold and enforce the current regulation(s) by order(s) of the said, GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL.

(ie; GST, busing school children. COURT ruling: GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL must comply with own regulation(s), order(s). In response, changed the regulation(s), order(s).)

 Does not the ADMIRALTY COURT'S of case law (colour of Martial Law) make a mockery of the administration, injustice for Her Majesty's Law?

If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please forward to:
E-mail - kisikawpimootewin
@signatoryindian.com
web site - signatoryindian.tripod.com

Or Join Us In Our Open Forum http://signatoryindian.tripod.com/forum/

Top Of Page