All peoples are invited to participate and share their information and knowledge regarding the routing that has enslaved
the Peoples of the world, enabling the corporations to destroy our food, water and air, upon pretence of greed for the natural
resources and if left unchecked, will lead to the total extinction of all life on the planet.
This website is a work in progress, as
such we will be adding additional documents on an on going basis. When we make an update, we will list it here.
New Update November 3, 2005:
re: "Self determination" (drafted and ratified constitution) for the Indigenous Peoples
on turtle island
Refer to Proposed Routing To Free The Sovereign Indigenous Peoples
Thank you for your patience
and for visiting our site.
Please note the scheme of enfranchisement
and its provisions
of enslaving the Sovereign Indigenous
Peoples under the subject matter jurisdiction titled CANADA. The scheme of the War Measures
Act and its Provisions upon
the pretence of order and good government continues to hold Her Majesty's Subjects and the enfranchised Sovereign Indigeous
Peoples, in a time of peace, hold in a lawless state of color and force
of Martial Law, by ever changing regulations of the titled Canada. If
you have any suggestions, or inquiries, please contact us. Contact
Information at the bottom of the page, or join us in our
open forum.
We are an open forum research and study group who collectively have journeyed
on a path for a number of years accumulating document(s) of the scheme(s) and routing used by the titled CANADA to enslave
and by fraud remove the Lawful standing, recognition and right of claim(s) of the referred to and titled separate and distinct
Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik (turtle island). We invite any and all to contribute and or assist us in
our journey.
By
right of Heritage, Custom, Usage and chosen mode(s) of life, I am kisikawpimootewin, bear clan, sentient Human being, Heir
and Successor, of a Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, referred to as NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S) on miskanahkministik.
I kisikawpimootewin am a Signatory and Beneficiary by adhesion, of accepted offer(s) of the Royal Proclamation, The Will and
Pleasure of Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) as Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s)
(hereinafter Her Majesty) for promise(s), benefit(s) and entitlement(s), under sealed Trust agreement(s) of the oral and written
talks and negotiations made Sovereign to Sovereign, for the titled:
1.Friendship
Treaties (for the mutual benefits for trade and commerce)
2.Peace
Treaties (to keep secure the trade and commerce)
3.Numbered Treaties (entrusting the Sovereign
Territories to Her Majesty)
Made with
Queen Victoria, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) as Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s), Successor(s) and Predecessor(s) that apply
equally to all or any of the referred to as Tribe(s) or Nation(s) of NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S) on the Trust Territories
titled Canada. And further are free to enter
into Treaties with Her Majesty, at any time or not, regardless of their choice, are always to remain unmolested and free in
their Heritage, customs, usage and chosen mode(s) of life on miskanahkministik, for as long as the Sun Shines and the River(s)
flow, on the land titled NORTH AMERICA. (Hereinafter Treaties)
-made with-
The sentient Human beings, of separate and
distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples, Their Heir(s) and Successor(s) on miskanahkministik, referred to as Tribe(s) or Nation(s)
of NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN(S), on the Trust Territories titled Canada (Hereinafter separate and distinct Peoples).
We respectfully submit, for your
review, consideration and comments the following information that our group believes is the routing and scheme(s) used by
the titled CANADA, to enslave by fraud, to remove the Lawful standing and Right(s) Of Claim, of the separate and distinct
Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik (turtle island).
The following are Her Majesty's Law (Royal
Certified Acts of the Parliament of Great Britain) in compliance to His Majesty King George III, Proclaimed Royal Will
and Pleasure of the titled Royal Proclamation, October 7, 1763. That upon pain of displeasure, (meaning at that time, for
refusing to obey, committing treason, was death) Her Majesty's loyal subjects are to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law, and
Her Majesty's loyal sworn Officer(s) are to obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty's Law regarding the Sovereign separate
and distinct Indigenous Peoples, Their Heir(s) and Successor(s) on miskanahkministik of the titled Canada.
Take note: Her Majesty's law stands forever as written and can never be changed or abolished.
His Majesty King George III (Royal Proclamation 1763) and Her Majesty Queen Victoria
acknowledged the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples as Sovereign(s), and their Right Of Claim(s) to their Sovereign
Territories on miskanahkministik (turtle island).
Her Majesty Queen Victoria in oral and written
negotiations with the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples entered into formal agreements, Sovereign to
Sovereign, binding their Heir(s) and Successor(s) for as long as the Sun Shines and the River(s) flow for the titled Friendship
Treaties (for the mutual benefits for trade and commerce) on miskanahkministik, and further entered into oral and written
negotiations and agreements to keep secure the titled Friendship Treaties, agreeing that neither side would molest nor harm
one another, nor interfere with the Heritage, Customs, Usage, mode(s) of life and Law, of the other, titled Peace Treaties
on miskanahkministik. Her Majesty Queen Victoria also made offers to assume as Fiduciary/Trustee the separate and distinct
Indigenous Peoples Sovereign Territories, that the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, by their
choice, could accept, whenever, if ever, the titled Numbered Treaties.(entrusting the Sovereign Territories to
Her Majesty)
Enfranchisement
is the freedom of choice of one of the Sovereign Peoples of a Sovereign country to request/apply to become one of the Sovereign
Peoples of another Sovereign country.
If accepted, they must bind themselves, under subject matter jurisdiction, by sworn
oath of allegiance, to only obey and uphold the Law (different from Sovereign country to Sovereign country but at all times,
stands as written and ageless, and can never be changed or abolished) for
that Sovereign country. Once sworn in, have lawful standing, right of claims, under subject matter jurisdiction, to be secure
and protected under law, as one of the Sovereign Peoples of that Sovereign country.
No Sovereign country upon pretence of discretion or by any other means can usurp subject matter
jurisdiction and enfranchiseSovereign Peoples of other Sovereign countries.
Even by United Nations conventions of war and conquest, the conquered Sovereign Peoples, must freely swear,
an oath of allegiance, to be lawfully bound, under the subject matter jurisdiction and law, of the conquering Sovereign country.
The Lawful standing
of the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, Their Heirs and Successor(s), Right(s) Of Claim(s), to the binding
agreements, and to their Sovereign Territories on miskanahkministik, was removed, in treason, with no authority of Her Majesty’s
Law, by fraud, by the titled Enfranchisement of the Sovereign and distinct group(s), their Heir(s) and Successor(s) and
its provision(s) of the titled CANADA, that usurped subject matter jurisdiction of the distinct group(s) under the titled
Governor of Canada and further by order of the Governor were enslaved under, with forced compliance of current regulation(s)
by order(s) of the titled MINISTER and DEPARTMENTS OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS OF CANADA andINDIAN ACT OF CANADA.
Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) for
the Commonwealth Countries swear an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors and bind
themselves to only obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty’s Law. For refusal are in breach and in dereliction of
the performance of there sworn duty to Her Majesty, committing act(s) of treason against Her Majesty.
Her Majesty's Officers for the titled
Canada are bound by their sworn oaths of allegiance, to Her Majesty, to only obey, uphold and enforce Her Majesty’s
Law, and refuse in dereliction of their performance of their sworn duties to obey, uphold, and enforce the Proclaimed
Royal Will and Pleasure of Her Majesty’s Law for the repeal of the enfranchisement of the separate and distinct Sovereign
Indigenous Peoples of Canada, and removal of all of its provision(s) and are committing with intent, knowledge and forethought
by conspired action(s) and act(s) of treason against the Proclaimed will of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and Her Predecessor(s).
And further, have refused in contempt to comply with International Law for the United Nations Conventions of Human Rights.
ie : decisions of July 30, 1981- Lovelace V. Canada (1981) 2H. R. L. J. 158
(UN H. R. C.).
And in contempt, continue to keep the sentient
Human beings of Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples, enslaved to a dictator, of the purported title,MINISTER
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS OF CANADA.
And
forced compliance to its regulation(s) of the purported title, INDIAN ACT OF CANADA
by pretence of provision(s) of the scheme of enfranchisement, of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples by
Order(s) of the purported title as,GOVERNOR OF CANADA.
1b. (found in Routing Used To Enslave The Non-Indigenous Peoples) DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS(highlighted in yellow page 3444)"No matter how parliament might protest under its own laws. They may wish a Mussolini in Italy, a Stalin
in Russia or a Hitler in Germany, but we do not need
a dictator in Canada; we do not need anyone exercising that sort of arbitrary
autocratic authority in this country, the pride and security of British Peoples with respect to all such matters lie in
their parliamentary institutions, and this parliament is the body to which the people of Canada must and have a right to look
to have taxation controlled,and for peace, order and good government in the true sense of the words."
Take note,
the previous Act(s) of MARTIAL LAW were made by the titled CANADA in treason,
The titled CANADA has no authority
to make LAW.
Please refer to the index that
lists the following correspondence hightlighted in yellow. Petitions and refusals of Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) for the
Trust Territories titled Canada:
4. Petition Of Right 1627
Please
carefully review, you will note, that at that time, the peoples of 1627, were held in a time of peace, in a lawless state, of colour and force of MARTIAL LAW, with no provisions, and
in contravention of Her Majesty’s Law, in exactly the same manner, that the Peoples on the Trust Territories
titled Canada, are being held under today.
4a. Petition Of Right 1860
Her Majesty's Law, by petition of Right, is
the only means in which Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) can be held accountable for their refusal, in breach and treason
of, their sworn oath(s), of their duty to Her Majesty.
As well as dereliction of their duty, for refusing to obey and uphold Her Majesty's
Law.
5. Letter And Petition To Queen's Privy Council For Canada May 13, 20045a. Take Notice, Failure
To Respond To Petition ByQueens
Privy Council For Canada May 25, 2004.
5a.Take Notice, Failure To Respond To Petition By Queens Privy Council For Canada May 25, 2004.
5b. Letter to Governor General /Refusal/Queen's Privy Council for Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's
Law.
6. Letter/Gov.Dept./OF CANADA/PRIVY OFFICE,Indians remain bound under enfranchisement scheme.
7.Petition Of Right - Federal Court June 9, 2004.
7a.Response/Refusal June 11, 2004 ADMIRALTY COURT OF CANADA/Her Majesty's Law Abolished.
I bring to your attention (attached herein) to the letter sent to Her Majesty and the Petition of Right,
for a claim of Right, brought before Her Majesty's Federal Court For Canada by kisikawpimootewin.
And
the response from the purported title; ADMIRALTY COURT OF CANADA, of the alleged "abolishment"
of Her Majesty's Law by a department of the purported title;" FEDERAL PARLIAMENT OF CANADA".
As such: Her Majesty's Law has no standing in
"CANADA".
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) Successor(s) and Predecessor(s) Royal Proclaimed
Will and Pleasure is enacted as standing Law by Royal Certified Act (s) of the Parliament of Great Britain. Her Majesty's
Law's cannot beabolished. They remain forever as written to be obeyed and upheld at all times.
7b.Federal Court Act 1970/Admiralty Court/enforcement of
currentregulations only.
8. Letter/Her Majesty/Refusal/by
Her Officers/Canada/to uphold Her Majesty's Law/Treason/June16,2004.
We have addressed the aforementioned situation, by Petition and a
formal written request to Her Majesty and await Her written response and/or action.
It is our intention, by Petition, to address the aforementioned,
before Her Majesty’s Court for Law, of the titled Great Britain. Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) are bound
by their oaths of allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heir(s) and Successor(s) to only obey, uphold and enforce
Her Majesty’s Law for the security and protection of the peoples of Her Majesty’s Commonwealth Countries.
If Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn Officer(s) for
the titled Great Britain fail/refuse to restore Her Majesty’s Law to secure and protect the peoples on the Trust Territories
titled Canada and fail/refuse to free and restore the Heritage, Customs and Usage to the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous
Peoples, on miskanahkministik and/or fulfill Her Majesty’s agreement(s) made with the separate and distinct Sovereign
Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. Upon failure/refusal, Her Majesty forfeit(s), any and all Lawful claims and/or interests
to the Trust Territories titled Canada, on miskanahkministik. The separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples
on miskanahkministik, then have lawful standing and Right of Claim(s) to petition the United Nation(s) Security Council to
send UN troops to secure and protect the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples, and other peoples on miskanahkministik
under International Law, until such time as the Trust Territories titled Canada are returned and under the Heritage, Customs,
and Usage of the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik.
Her Majesty's Parliament(s), For Her Dominion(s), have
no power or authority to make it's own Law(s). Enacted as Royal Certified Act(s) of the Parliament(s) of Her Dominion(s),
are only empowered to make enactment(s) for law. Statutes for enforcement for law as Royal Certified Act(s), of the Parliament
of Great Britain. That when published in the Gazette, is law that Her Majesty's Loving Loyal subject(s) and Loyal sworn Officer(s)
must obey and uphold. That said, all sentient Human Beings in good conscience should be seeking answers to the following questions:
1. What Legal instrument (Royal Certified Act of the Parliament of
Great Britain) empowered and authorized the War Measures Act of 1914. And its provision(s) to dissolve Her Majesty's Dominion
of Canada and power and authority of Her Majesty's Law and Parliament For the Dominion of Canada. Usurping subject mater jurisdiction
of Her Majesty's Loyal Subject(s) and separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples under colour and force of Marshall Law?
2. Why are Her
Majesty's Loyal Subject(s) and separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik, upon pretense of provision(s)
of the enfranchisement scheme and upon pretense of provision(s) of order, security and good government of the War Measures
Act 1914, held in a lawless state, of colour and force of Marshall Law, as regulations, by order(s) of a self-declared defacto
GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL of the purported title CANADA?
3. Why hasn't Her Majesty ordered, or by force, reinstated
Her Dominion of Canada, and the power and authority of Her Law to the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada? For the security
and protection of Her Majesty's Loyal subjects on miskanahkministik.
4.As justification
upon pretense of provision(s) of the enfranchisement scheme and the War Measures Act. Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s)
appointed as commissioner(s) acting for the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL of the purported title CANADA in dereliction
of duty are in treason of their sworn oath to Her Majesty. They refuse to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law, treaties, agreements
and obligation(s) therein made with the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik.
5. Why hasn't Her Majesty ordered or addressed:
The dereliction of duty in treason of sworn
oaths for Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s)?
The refusal to obey and uphold Her Majesty's Law as
Royal Proclamation and peace, Friendship (Trade and Commerce) and Numbered Treaties and law relating thereto made with the
separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik Sovereign to Sovereign?
6. Her Majesty's Loyal sworn Officer(s) have no power or authority, to refuse, amend or abolishHer Majesty's Treaties, agreement(s) and Law relating
to the Peace and Friendship (trade and commerce) Treaties and Numbered Treaties made with the Sovereign Indigenous Peoples
on miskanahkministik.
Nor to negotiate and make additional
agreement(s) and purported Land claim Treaties with the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik.
By what power or authority does the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR of the purported title of CANADA, have legal standing,
to bind the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik? Upon pretense of purported Land claims
referred to as Treaties, negotiated with it's appointed employed representatives of its Departments of the titled FEDERAL
and PROVINCIAL GOVERNING STRUCTURES and the titled INDIAN BAND(S)?
7. By Her Majesty's action or lack thereof to secure
and protect Her Majesty's Loving Loyal Subject(s) on miskanahkministik. Or to uphold and enforce the aforementioned Treaties,
made with the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik. Has Her Majesty forfeited any and all
claim or rights on miskanahkministik?
8. Should not the separate and distinct Sovereign Indigenous
Peoples on miskanahkministik and other Peoples on miskanahkministik, petition the United Nations Human Rights Committee, to
be freed from a lawless state, of the self-declared defacto GOVERNOR of the purported title CANADA? To be secure and protected
under International Law? Until such time as the Trust Territories are returned, and under control, by Heritage, Custom(s)
and Law(s) of the Sovereign separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples on miskanahkministik?
9.Her Majesty's
Loyal sworn Officer(s) appointed as Commissioner(s) or Minister(s) acting for the self- declared defacto GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL
of the purported CANADA ADMIRALTY COURT declare and note the existence of Her Majesty's Law, but has no standing, force or
effect. They only uphold and enforce the current regulation(s) by order(s) of the said, GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL.
(ie; GST, busing school children.
COURT ruling: GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL must comply with own regulation(s), order(s). In response, changed the regulation(s),
order(s).)
Does not the ADMIRALTY COURT'S
of case law (colour of Martial Law) make a mockery of the administration, injustice for Her Majesty's Law?
If
you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please forward to: E-mail - kisikawpimootewin@signatoryindian.com web site - signatoryindian.tripod.com
